Sanatana
Dharma or Hinduism is inarguably the largest ancient religion in the world; perhaps
it is the only religion in the world which was not founded by a particular
person, currently it is the third largest followed religion after Christianity &
Islam.
The meaning
of Sanatana Dharma or what we call it today as Hinduism simply means “an
eternal way of righteous (Dharmic) living”, so at the outset it is not
merely a religion, at its core it is a particular way of living.
In between 7th-8th
century arab traders started to flock India for trade at the Malabar Coast down
the south western India, That is the first time when India felt the presence of
Islam. During late 10th & early 11th Century Muslim
rulers invaded the land across the river Indus (Northern India), they called
this land as Al-Hind (Persian term),
meaning land of Hindus. The word Hindu is in turn derived from Sanskrit word Sindhu. This land of Hindus later came
to be known as Hindustan in late 12th & early 13th
Century and finally the religion practiced by Hindus came to be known as
Hinduism to the world.
Many Hindu
spiritual leaders & scholars would refer their religion as Sanatana dharma
rather than Hinduism because it rightly describes our religion. I would
personally like to call my religion as Sanatana Dharma; I would also request
all Hindus to refer their religion as Sanatana Dharma rather than Hinduism.
Why should we call our religion Sanatana Dharma rather
than Hinduism?
Well a name
is not merely an Identity, there is always a meaning associated with a name,
Hinduism simply implies religion of Hindus, well that will not truly convey the
essence of our religion does it.
In India we
have changed the name of cities citing various reasons, example Bombay became
Mumbai, Madras became Chennai, Calcutta became Kolkatta and Bangalore became Bengaluru,
personally I don’t give a damn about changing the name of a city unless there
is a logical reasoning behind it, for example change is city’s name might be to
restore the historical identity or regional identity of a city, If we can think
a lot about name of a city, why can’t we think over the name of a religion
which we are following. If it truly defines our Identity then why shouldn’t we
embrace our religion by recalling (Not renaming) it as Sanatana Dharma as it
used to be thousands of years ago.
But it
would be very naive on my part to suggest that by merely recalling our ancient
religion as Sanatana dharma, we would be able to solve the problems faced by followers
of our Sanatana Dharma. Unless until us i.e. younger generation do not truly
understand or at least try to understand our religion, we would not be able to
judge the validity of our religious practices & traditions and in turn we
would not be able to know how great our religion is.
Unlike
other religions, Sanatana Dharma has many complex rituals, practices, code of
conduct etc... For those who truly understand the significance & meaning of
these practices they will embrace it, for many who don’t understand it they
would blindly follow, while few others simply criticize it.
Today
Science has shown us that we genetically inherit common traits of our
ancestors, forefathers and parents. That is something which takes place
genetically for which we don’t have any control over. That means we cannot wish
to have a particular trait from our parents or ancestors, simply put that it is
beyond our control, but we just don’t inherit the genetic information from our
parents or ancestors; we also inherited the information about our religion,
tradition, culture which was passed onto us by generation to generation orally
(Sruti). This is something of course which we have control over, right?
Well
suppose some might ask, “If parents didn’t pass on any information about our
religious practices or culture or tradition, what can we do?” Others might say,
“My parents have told me about certain religious practices or traditions, but
they haven’t told me about its relevance or importance?” Many people who
question in above manner shall either follow religious practice blindly or
abstain from any religious practice or simply say that these practices are
unscientific or irrelevant.
This is the
main problem that our Sanatana dharma is facing today. Following a religion or
faith blindly without understanding its religious principles, practices, its
relevance, and its importance is no better than not following the religion at
all. In my view both are same. A level headed person would not out rightly dismisses
a religion just because he does not know the importance or relevance of certain
religious practices, he shall probe further in pursuit of understanding the
religious practices either by reading religious books or by asking learned men.
Very few people do this, most of them simply pass the buck & say they don’t
have enough time to read books or they are not interested in these stuff or
some might even be afraid of asking or cross questioning their parents
regarding religious practices, hence some might blindly follow the religion,
while others simply denounce it & say it’s a Crap.
In
religious matters the Onus lies on our elders, our parents, If a Child Asks
his/her parent queries about our religious practices or principles, they should
answer the child’s queries with utmost responsibility. If for instance a parent
doesn’t know any answer to the child’s question, then they should not yell at
the child to keep quite & simply follow religious practice, if parents do
that, that’s the biggest disservice that they are doing to their religion. If
the child is grown enough, parents should buy them a book which explains the
principles, relevance & importance of following our religious practices or
they should try to find answer to child’s queries from learned men & then
pass the same to their child, according to me that’s biggest service one can do
to our Sanatana dharma, i.e. keeping our religion alive.
Many times
I have witnessed during debates or interactions, our Sanatana dharma followers
(Especially Younger generation) fail to give a substantial & constructive
reply to rebut the atheists and other religious followers (Ex: Christians,
Muslims etc) who criticize our religious practices, its culture &
traditions, they even go to an extent to denounce our religion by not even
trying to understand the vast knowledge & scientific validity behind our
religious practices. This by no means a victory of other religion & defeat
of Sanatana Dharma. But certainly that is an embarrassing scenario. Hence I
would urge all Hindus to at least try to gain some basic fundamental knowledge,
let’s say like a general knowledge about our Sanatana dharma, so that we can give
a befitting reply & defend our religion & its practices during
religious hostilities.
In this
Article I have listed out few common questions that are raised against Sanatana
Dharma by Other religious followers & atheists, I will try to answer
these questions to the best of my knowledge in this blog, here are those questions:
1. Why do we
Worship Idols?
2. What is the
idea of god in Sanatana Dharma? Why so many gods in Sanatana Dharma?
3. Why there
are so many rituals in Sanatana Dharma? Why shouldn’t the resource spent on
these rituals be used to help poor people or people who are in need?
4. Sanatana Dharma
is the root cause of caste system which India is facing today?
5. Why
Sanatana Dharma prescribes Vegetarianism?
6. What
Sanatana Dharma says about Other Religions?
7. Why Hindu
Religious Centres such as Temples have become a Commercial centres today?
13. What is the
meaning of Dharma?
14. Ramayana
& Mahabharata is History or Mythology?
15. Why we see
Good people suffering while bad people are prospering in this world?
16. If God is
there why can’t he intervene & kill all bad people, what is he waiting for?
17. Who is a
Brahmin?
18. Manusmriti
was bias towards Brahmins & hostile towards Shudras, hence it endorsed
untouchability?
19. Why
Sanatana Dharma is not spreading like Islam or Christianity in the world?
20. Why Temples
have erotic sculptures on their Walls?
21. Why all
ancient scriptures in India are written in Sanskrit?
22. Should we
build Temples to our God?
23. Is it true
that women have no Equal rights in Sanatana Dharma?
24. What is the
Objective of a Hindu in life?
25. What is the
essence of Gayathri mantra?
Before
answering these questions, we should ask ourselves, why such questions are
being asked. Let us analyse this first.
Such
Questions are not new to Sanatana dharma, if we look at the history of Sanatana
dharma, we will understand how tolerant our religion has been. During the early
days of Buddhism in India, a heterodox hindu system (Nastika) called ‘Carvaka’ (Also known as Lokayata) was emerging as an alternative
to pro vedic Astika school of thought. The people who believed in Carvaka
philosophy started to denounce Sanatana dharma & its principles. Pro vedic
Scholars such as Kumarilla Bhatta, Adi Shankaracharya among others debated Carvaka
philosophers & Buddhist Scholars to restore the Sanatana Dharma in this
land.
A
religion can only be sustained & practiced if it is supported by people who
have vision & power of policy making in their hands, usually in olden days
it was Kings, Monarch, and nowadays it’s our Politicians.
In
ancient times when kings used to rule the land, they were supreme authority,
the king was not only responsible for socio-economic development of his
territory, safety, security & well being of his citizens, but he was also
responsible for safeguarding of culture, traditions & religion.
If
we look into the history, India has been ruled by many rulers of diverse
religion, During the time of Ashoka, Buddhism was thriving in India, because he
believed in that religion & supported it, during the rule of moghuls
(Muslim rulers) Islam was propagated in India, Speaking about Moghul rule I
must say few important things, probably during the moghul rule (Perhaps except
during Akbar’s rule) Hinduism witnessed darkest days in India. It’s a
historical fact that moghul rulers such as Muhammed Gazni, Muhammad Ghori,
Aurangzeb, & Muhammed bin Tughluq were hard core muslim rulers who took
part in destroying many Hindu temples & Religious centres. They also involved
in forced conversions of non-muslims, infact during Moghul rule, non-muslims
had to pay ‘Jizya’ a form of Tax to
rulers to practice their religion. What a pity? Hindus in their own land had to
pay the tax to practice Sanatana dharma (Hinduism). During British rule, many
Christian Missionaries were established in India which propagated Christianity.
Of
course I need not mention under whose rule Hinduism or Sanatana dharma
prospered, People like Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Sri Krishnadevaraya,
Prithviraj Chauhan, Under Cholas, Gangas, Vijayanagara, Kadambas, Chalukyas,
Rashtrakutas etc..Under all these able rulers & empire, Sanatana dharma prospered
across the length & breadth of the country.
Muslims
ruled India for more than 800 years and Christians ruled for more than 400
years. In spite of this Sanatana dharma is still a majority religion in India,
that itself speaks the volume about the how deep rooted Sanatana dharma is in
India. Clearly “you can take away a Hindu from
India but one can’t take away Hinduism from India.”
The
reason why I am giving these examples is because, these example indicate the
simple fact that usually the head or leaders of the country or state are the
one who play a crucial role in propagation & prosperity of a religion, it’s
not a rocket science.
Today
India is a secular country, our constitution guarantees us a fundamental right
to practice any religion or any faith that we desire without any discrimination,
which is very good, but at times the word secularism is used in wrong way to
appease certain section of minority religion, Sri L.K.Advani, one of the tallest
leaders of BJP calls this as ‘Minorityism’, in broad sense it can be called as
‘Pseudo Secularism’.
When
I say Pseudo Secularism, what exactly do I mean?
Let’s
look at an example, suppose a Christian can proudly say he is proud to be a Christian and Islamists can proudly say they are proud to be a Muslim but when a Hindu say he
is proud to be a Hindu, So called Liberals, Intellectuals & Secular politicians brand it as communal. Similarly if the question of Ayodhya is raised so called secular people will tell its the development issue which matters & not these religious issues any more, The Question is Who told these secular people that Hidutva & Development cannot go hand to hand together, in fact our ancient India was much more scientifically advanced compared to other countries during those times. Kindly look into this blog of Sri L.K.Advani who clearly explains the Pseudo secularism v/s Secularism in India
http://www.lkadvani.in/eng/content/view/381/349/
http://www.lkadvani.in/eng/content/view/381/349/
It’s
very simple to understand why politicians are doing this; they are doing this
for vote bank, nothing else. I think it’s right time that we Hindus should think
about this, Hindus have never been hostile to any religion or faith, in fact,
we Hindus believe that all road or path leads to god, "Ekam Sat Viprah bahuda vadanti",
which means "there is only one truth, wise men interpret it differently". Our
Vedas have also proclaimed "Vasudaiva Kutumbakam" which means "World is like One family". But when other religion starts to target Hinduism
unduly, that’s when things go wrong.
It’s
high time that we Hindus unite together, not to make India a non secular
country but to make India a Strong country, we can do it only when we truly
realize how great our religion is, that can happen only if the younger
generation realize the importance of our religious principles, practices &
its culture and tradition. It’s time that we reinstate the past glory of this
great nation.
I would try to answer the questions which was listed in this post in my future posts. Watch out for them.
1 comment:
i inviteyou to our community
sanatana dharma
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/102371317947609894619
Post a Comment